Add reproducible evaluation and provenance research

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-17 10:40:29 -05:00
parent d9fc3ca18b
commit 68f02d035f
53 changed files with 1432 additions and 14 deletions
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
# Research Program
## Research question
Can a constrained, local-first security agent normalize AI-related artifacts, apply transparent policies, and produce useful evidence without executing untrusted content or sending it to an external service?
## Current method
AAISA separates discovery, immutable artifact evidence, deterministic policy evaluation, reporting, and human decision. Research claims are tied to versioned code, fixture digests, explicit limitations, and reproducible commands.
## Current workstreams
1. Artifact schemas and safe parsers
2. Rule quality and evaluation science
3. Prompt and agent-tool security
4. Model and dataset provenance
5. Software supply-chain evidence
6. SARIF and interoperability
7. Privacy, redaction, and secure report handling
8. Contributor experience and governance
## Research boundaries
The default system does not execute artifacts, make network requests, exploit targets, recover credentials, or modify source content. Probabilistic analyzers remain out of scope until isolation, provenance, confidence, and data-governance requirements are approved.